Have any of you ever heard of the term Gerrymandering? It is a weird word, with a fairly unknown meaning. Gerrymandering is the process by which a group in control of the legislature of a state or country, will draw voting district lines in a way that allows them to have more representatives than their percentage of the population would allow normally. It also allows wealthy donors to find the candidates who will most likely provide the swing vote in a decision that benefits the donor, and donate less money to greater effect. While I am going to write mostly about what has been done by Republicans over the last few decades, this is not limited to Republicans alone, they just have done it more in the last few decades.
I am going to talk about a simple example of gerrymandering, then you can extrapolate it out to see how it would work in reality.
Now who do you think has the power to decide how the district lines are drawn? It is usually the party in power in the state where they are redrawing the lines. That means that after the Republican party spent the 1980s on “Operation Red State”, which was a plan to take control of as many state and local legislatures as possible so that they could redraw the lines to give them as much of an advantage as possible. They did this because they saw the country moving more and more ideologically away from their positions. Instead of changing their values to more accurately reflect their constituents, they used what power they could to take away the power of people who disagreed with them.
Before I go on, I want to say that this is all legal. It is something that they were allowed to do under the law. However, what has resulted is districts that look like this:
I don’t know about you, but those districts are only that shape for one reason, to take power away from one group and give it to another. This process is one by which the Republican party has managed to control the House of Representatives for so many years, even as the country is shifting away from them. I know you can point to a year here or there where the Democrats were in control, but in this case the exceptions prove the rule when you look at all the other factors responsible.
How does this effect people like you and me. The answer to that is both simple and complicated. The simple answer is this, if you live in a district that has been shaped for political advantage, then your vote counts less (or more) than it normally should. The more complicated answer has to do with wealthy campaign contributions and what effect it has on business and tax laws. If these lines have been drawn so that the majority of districts, even with a minority of overall individuals, all have representatives who are favorable to big business, then these businesses need to contribute less money to win control of areas that will provide them with tax breaks. Is it any surprise that money in politics is the root of many of these problems? Who do you think donates to campaigns in close races? Who do you think benefits the most from gerrymandering? Hint: it isn’t you and me, this doesn’t benefit us at all.
One solution, though it may not be possible in the U.S., is to adopt a system where we take the popular vote in a state, and allow that state to send representatives based on the popular vote, instead of by district. For example, in Texas the state (heavily gerrymandered) voted 52% Rep, 43% Dem, and 5% Ind. However their representatives are 24 Rep, 12 Dem, and 0 Ind. If this was split up based on popular vote, then the Rep would have 19 representatives, Dems would have 16 representatives and Independents would have 1 representative. That seems an inherently more balanced way to adjudicate the system.
Another possible solution would be to enact laws that say a district must maintain a certain density, so that it is not sprawling out all over the place. If we were to redraw districts so that they made geographic and population sense, instead of political sense, much of this would disappear. There are no states that look like some of these gerrymandered districts, and amazingly enough the U.S. Senate which is two senators per state, is fairly close to the national distribution of left and right leaning individuals. With no gerrymandering, it is possible to have fair and balanced elections.
If you are like me, you don’t just want to understand a problem, you want to know what you can do about it. There are a few things you can do:
- You can write your congressperson asking for them to work hard on campaign finance reform
- You can also contact your congress people and ask for non-partisan redistricting in your state
- You can push for laws governing the drawing of districts that prevent this sort of thing from ever happening again
- You can educate yourself more and pass information like this along
- You can research which candidates actually support (and have voted to support) ending gerrymandering
Thanks for reading, and I know this one was dry, but it is an important lesson.
– Jeremy Larsen
Speaker, Author, Progressive